<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: *The Importance Of The Asterisk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.critiquethis.us/2009/07/29/the-importance-of-the-asterisk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.critiquethis.us/2009/07/29/the-importance-of-the-asterisk/</link>
	<description>Critique This is an architecture blog in a magazine format which critically examines the state of architecture within the United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:56:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance Oyler</title>
		<link>http://www.critiquethis.us/2009/07/29/the-importance-of-the-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-2629</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance Oyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 06:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critiquethis.us/?p=684#comment-2629</guid>
		<description>I appreaciate the time an effort you have spent researching this!

As I understand it, it is up to the state whether or not you can appeal the results on an exam.  In the state of Washington, I was told by the Department of Lisencing that appeals are not allowed.  End of discussion, thank you, have a good day.  

Of course this answered none of my questions.  I failed Building Technology twice.  I had passed the other 8 sections of ARE 3.1 on the first attempt.  I have the usual questions:  How can I fail the Structural Layout Vignette twice, when I have done my own structural drafting for the past 10 years?  How could I fail what I thought was the easiest of the nine exams twice?  etc...  What really troubles me is that this is the only section I took in Oregon and both times I failed.  I was assured that it would make no difference which state I took the test.  Now I wonder if that was true.  Certainly based upon your article, it affects the appeal process (if there were one.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreaciate the time an effort you have spent researching this!</p>
<p>As I understand it, it is up to the state whether or not you can appeal the results on an exam.  In the state of Washington, I was told by the Department of Lisencing that appeals are not allowed.  End of discussion, thank you, have a good day.  </p>
<p>Of course this answered none of my questions.  I failed Building Technology twice.  I had passed the other 8 sections of ARE 3.1 on the first attempt.  I have the usual questions:  How can I fail the Structural Layout Vignette twice, when I have done my own structural drafting for the past 10 years?  How could I fail what I thought was the easiest of the nine exams twice?  etc&#8230;  What really troubles me is that this is the only section I took in Oregon and both times I failed.  I was assured that it would make no difference which state I took the test.  Now I wonder if that was true.  Certainly based upon your article, it affects the appeal process (if there were one.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ampdesign</title>
		<link>http://www.critiquethis.us/2009/07/29/the-importance-of-the-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-812</link>
		<dc:creator>Ampdesign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 05:43:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critiquethis.us/?p=684#comment-812</guid>
		<description>Yes...NCARB is the Star Chamber.  As for conflicting information,  I was told by the phone jockey on the other end and the supervisor of the phone jockey and yet another phone jockey, that I could not appeal the test I failed...period.  I know this to be a complete lie but they stood their ground.  It seems like a phone jockey with a GED is giuding my career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes&#8230;NCARB is the Star Chamber.  As for conflicting information,  I was told by the phone jockey on the other end and the supervisor of the phone jockey and yet another phone jockey, that I could not appeal the test I failed&#8230;period.  I know this to be a complete lie but they stood their ground.  It seems like a phone jockey with a GED is giuding my career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ARE, NCARB, Errors, Omissions &#38; Quiet Corrections &#124; A Critical Architecture Blog &#124; Critique This!</title>
		<link>http://www.critiquethis.us/2009/07/29/the-importance-of-the-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-563</link>
		<dc:creator>ARE, NCARB, Errors, Omissions &#38; Quiet Corrections &#124; A Critical Architecture Blog &#124; Critique This!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 22:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critiquethis.us/?p=684#comment-563</guid>
		<description>[...] matrix, and yet another reason why NCARB needs an appellate process that works. See my article *The Importance Of The Asterisk if you think that one already exist. If you are not familiar with the process you&#8217;ll find out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] matrix, and yet another reason why NCARB needs an appellate process that works. See my article *The Importance Of The Asterisk if you think that one already exist. If you are not familiar with the process you&#8217;ll find out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.critiquethis.us/2009/07/29/the-importance-of-the-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-561</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 14:48:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critiquethis.us/?p=684#comment-561</guid>
		<description>I think that there are many people that feel the same way that you and I do. The system is corrupt and I am not sure how to fix it. All we can do at this point is to remember this experience and hopefully one day one of us will be in a position with enough power to correct the process, and turn what is nothing more than a cash cow into a right of passage that we can feel proud for achieving, rather than leaving us all empty asking where the last few years went.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that there are many people that feel the same way that you and I do. The system is corrupt and I am not sure how to fix it. All we can do at this point is to remember this experience and hopefully one day one of us will be in a position with enough power to correct the process, and turn what is nothing more than a cash cow into a right of passage that we can feel proud for achieving, rather than leaving us all empty asking where the last few years went.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Name</title>
		<link>http://www.critiquethis.us/2009/07/29/the-importance-of-the-asterisk/comment-page-1/#comment-549</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Name</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 04:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critiquethis.us/?p=684#comment-549</guid>
		<description>Thank you so much for your post on the ridiculous and ludicrously expensive NCARB system. Even passing exams, I feel like somehow I am getting ripped off.  Does it really take 3 months to grade a computerized test?!   I just received my first fail result and was at a loss as to what I&#039;d done wrong.  It took me a while to decipher the asterix/no asterix code and I was wondering whether it was worth appealing.  It seems either way is just costly and frustrating.  I feel trapped by the system, but it really helps to read posts like yours that shed a bit of light and a sprinkling of humor on the shadowy, backward NCARB machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for your post on the ridiculous and ludicrously expensive NCARB system. Even passing exams, I feel like somehow I am getting ripped off.  Does it really take 3 months to grade a computerized test?!   I just received my first fail result and was at a loss as to what I&#8217;d done wrong.  It took me a while to decipher the asterix/no asterix code and I was wondering whether it was worth appealing.  It seems either way is just costly and frustrating.  I feel trapped by the system, but it really helps to read posts like yours that shed a bit of light and a sprinkling of humor on the shadowy, backward NCARB machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
