<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: no Ya-Ya, people want architecture at a Great Value</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.critiquethis.us/2010/01/19/no-ya-ya-people-want-architecture-at-a-great-value/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.critiquethis.us/2010/01/19/no-ya-ya-people-want-architecture-at-a-great-value/</link>
	<description>Critique This is an architecture blog in a magazine format which critically examines the state of architecture within the United States.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 17:56:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.critiquethis.us/2010/01/19/no-ya-ya-people-want-architecture-at-a-great-value/comment-page-1/#comment-2870</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 12:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.critiquethis.us/?p=1758#comment-2870</guid>
		<description>I made a slight revision to this article upon publishing. Previously a sentence in the article read:

&quot;The primary design driver that has made the period of ya-ya so damaging to the profession of architecture is that the architectural one-liner was back and in a big way.&quot;

This sentence was not an attack on ya-ya or the one-liner. The statement was meant to suggest that students are focusing on developing one-liners rather than focusing in on the process of architecture. The above sentence has been revised with the added statement of clarification:

&quot;This is damaging, because young students studying architecture in universities focus on developing clever solutions to architectural problems rather than learning a critical design process that they can use and develop as they grow as an architect.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I made a slight revision to this article upon publishing. Previously a sentence in the article read:</p>
<p>&#8220;The primary design driver that has made the period of ya-ya so damaging to the profession of architecture is that the architectural one-liner was back and in a big way.&#8221;</p>
<p>This sentence was not an attack on ya-ya or the one-liner. The statement was meant to suggest that students are focusing on developing one-liners rather than focusing in on the process of architecture. The above sentence has been revised with the added statement of clarification:</p>
<p>&#8220;This is damaging, because young students studying architecture in universities focus on developing clever solutions to architectural problems rather than learning a critical design process that they can use and develop as they grow as an architect.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.301 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-07-30 06:09:14 -->
