• Front Page
• About Critique This
  • About
  • Advertise
    • Thank You
  • Critique This Award
  • Blog
  • Constitution
  • Contact Us
  • Social Networks
  • Submit a Story
  • Terms of Use
  • Web Development
  • Writers
    • James Cornetet, RA
    • Geoff Simmons
• Architecture
  • Architecture
    • Architecture by Architect
    • Architecture by Location
  • Architectural Products and Manufacturers
  • Architecture Book Reviews
  • Path to Architectural Registration
  • Photo Gallery of Architecture
  • Quote Of The Week
  • Sustainable Design
• Architectural Graphics
  • Architectural Diagrams
  • Graphic Design Inspiration for Architects
  • Graphic Resources for Architects
    • 3D Entourage
    • 2D Entourage
  • Software
  • Video Tutorials
• Architecture Links
  • Architecture Blog Links
  • Architecture Firm Links
  • Architecture Magazine Links
  • Architecture Product & Material Manufacturer Links
  • Architecture Professional Organization Links
  • ARE & Licensure Links
  • Construction Organization Links
  • Digital Fabrication & Fabricator Links
  • Physical Computing Links
  • Prefabrication & Panelized Systems
  • Software Links
  • State Boards of Architecture Registration Links
  • University Links
  • Web Design Links

About

Critique This is about. . .

It is tough for anyone to define a thing, it is generally much easier to describe how you feel about said thing, rather than creating a line of logic describing what it is you are trying to define.  Often people associate architects with drawing or performing structural calculations, but the one skill that defines what an architect is, is the critique. The ability to effectively critique our environment and just about any other object is what gives us our competitive edge. It seems that the critique is slowly fading away. Unfortunately we are no longer concerned with creating buildings that have spirit, instead we are only concerned with the latest architectural styles, fashions, and trends. The art of the critique is all but lost, and the profession of architecture is rapidly losing credibility and talent to other fields due to our recent fascination with everything new.

This fashionable fascination with the architectural avant-garde is most evident in the content of the popular architectural publications circulated in the United States. Compare the content, diagrams and depth of analysis of In Detail, el Croquis and Bauwelt to American publications that instead focus on image. While many architectural publications in the U.S. are guilty of being promoters of fashion, the blogs are nothing more than visual buffets of sexy renderings.  Most of the popular blogs do not even produce their own content, they simply publish the work of others, good or bad, and usually unbuilt.  These blogs are only concerned with quantity of content, not quality.  One of my favorite blogs used to be DeZeen, which at one time I thought would be able to sustain itself and do what others could not, but it appears that they too are starting to drink the Kool-Aid.  I studied all of the architectural blogs on the internet that I read on a daily basis, and when writing this article I studied how other blogs described their sites.  The number one promise that was made on nearly every blog was that they promised to supply content, nothing about quality or what their mission was.  So after reading the description of the DeZeen site I was not surprised to read that their promise was to feed you content before anyone else could, and were so bold as to post the following quote “. . .  (DeZeen) has grown rapidly to become one of the most popular and influential architecture and design blogs on the internet.”  If popularity is what you crave, fine, but how are they influential?

Critique This at the most general level is simply about architecture, but more importantly it is about change.  Our mission is to change how the architectural community discusses and views architecture.  It was this apparent lack of criticalness within the profession that prompted the creation of this site.  After a couple of drinks we joked about naming the site U.S. Architecture Sux, not because U.S. architecture sucks, but as a satirical name that describes the state of criticism within the architecture profession. The truth is that U.S. architecture does not suck, but there are a lot of things that are broken in the profession. Specifically the lack of critical thought. When asking students to describe a building or design, they commonly state that “I like it” or “it sucks!”. Our mission is to make you think about everything critically and avoid the pitfalls that others embrace.

Our promise is not that if you vote for us, we’ll make all of your wildest dreams come true, but our promise is to discuss serious issues within and outside of the architectural profession in a critical manner devoid of personal preference and bias.  Our mission is outlined in the Critique This Constitution which is a document that we have drafted to explicitly state our core values for you the reader, and ourselves so that we never lose our way.  Feel free to Critique This below.

Best regards,

James Cornetet